[Trilinos-Users] Trilinos-Users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2
Ajay Rawat
ajay.rawat83 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 01:27:15 MDT 2011
make -j 4
works fine for me for 10.6.4
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30 PM, <trilinos-users-request at software.sandia.gov
> wrote:
> Send Trilinos-Users mailing list submissions to
> trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> trilinos-users-request at software.sandia.gov
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> trilinos-users-owner at software.sandia.gov
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Trilinos-Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Question about Make -j (Matt G)
> 2. Re: Question about Make -j (Bartlett, Roscoe A)
> 3. Re: Question about Make -j (Dave Wade-Stein)
> 4. Re: Question about Make -j (Heroux, Michael A)
> 5. Re: Question about Make -j (Heroux, Michael A)
> 6. Re: Question about Make -j (Matt G)
> 7. Re: Question about Make -j (Nuno Sucena Almeida)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:45:13 -0500
> From: "Matt G" <mgoodman at email.arizona.edu>
> Subject: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Message-ID: <BANLkTikL5CaFq7ChQA0M11f0tXGeJLVBig at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to automate
> the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j)
> behave unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under
> the cmake based 10 branch?
>
> Thanks.
> --Matthew Goodman
>
> =====================
> Check Out My Website: http://craneium.net
> Find me on LinkedIn: http://tinyurl.com/d6wlch
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://software.sandia.gov/pipermail/trilinos-users/attachments/20110606/303da08d/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:53:04 +0000
> From: "Bartlett, Roscoe A" <rabartl at sandia.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: Matt G <mgoodman at email.arizona.edu>,
> "trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov"
> <trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov>
> Message-ID:
> <6CC53491CB5E4E4FA1423EFA578E4BC70ED25C72 at EXMB03.srn.sandia.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Matt,
>
> I use 'make -jN' (where N=4, 8, etc.) all of the time and it seems to work
> perfectly. All of the Trilinos test scripts using parallel builds. If this
> does not work let me know.
>
> -Ross
>
> From: trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov [mailto:
> trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov] On Behalf Of Matt G
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 5:45 PM
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Subject: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
>
> I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to automate
> the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j) behave
> unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under the
> cmake based 10 branch?
>
> Thanks.
> --Matthew Goodman
>
> =====================
> Check Out My Website: http://craneium.net
> Find me on LinkedIn: http://tinyurl.com/d6wlch
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://software.sandia.gov/pipermail/trilinos-users/attachments/20110606/88b008cd/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:05:57 -0600
> From: "Dave Wade-Stein" <dws at txcorp.com>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Message-ID: <628C8A15-65E0-4C79-A2C1-FCF06253BDC1 at txcorp.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> We routinely use -j 4 when building Trilinos 10.2.0 with no problems.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Matt G wrote:
>
> > I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to automate
> the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j) behave
> unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under the
> cmake based 10 branch?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --Matthew Goodman
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:33:59 +0000
> From: "Heroux, Michael A" <maherou at sandia.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: Dave Wade-Stein <dws at txcorp.com>,
> "trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov"
> <trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov>
> Message-ID:
> <28750E806057074E96CA7C2F9ADE20F60EAD93B3 at EXMB01.srn.sandia.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I tend to use about 2x the number of cores on the system, assuming there is
> a healthy amount of memory on the system.
>
> Mike
>
> ________________________________________
> From: trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov [
> trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov] on behalf of Dave Wade-Stein [
> dws at txcorp.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:05 PM
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
>
> We routinely use -j 4 when building Trilinos 10.2.0 with no problems.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Matt G wrote:
>
> > I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to automate
> the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j) behave
> unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under the
> cmake based 10 branch?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --Matthew Goodman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trilinos-Users mailing list
> Trilinos-Users at software.sandia.gov
> http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:35:14 +0000
> From: "Heroux, Michael A" <maherou at sandia.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: Dave Wade-Stein <dws at txcorp.com>,
> "trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov"
> <trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov>
> Message-ID:
> <28750E806057074E96CA7C2F9ADE20F60EAD93B0 at EXMB01.srn.sandia.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I tend to use about 2x the number of cores on the system, assuming a
> healthy amount of memory.
>
> Mike
> ________________________________________
> From: trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov [
> trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov] on behalf of Dave Wade-Stein [
> dws at txcorp.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:05 PM
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
>
> We routinely use -j 4 when building Trilinos 10.2.0 with no problems.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Matt G wrote:
>
> > I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to automate
> the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j) behave
> unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under the
> cmake based 10 branch?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --Matthew Goodman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trilinos-Users mailing list
> Trilinos-Users at software.sandia.gov
> http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:05:24 -0500
> From: "Matt G" <mgoodman at email.arizona.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: "Heroux, Michael A" <maherou at sandia.gov>
> Cc: "trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov"
> <trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov>
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=BHk-sVhm8kp9NWh=FtfJD89o8fQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Awesome. Thanks all for the quick response.
> --Matthew Goodman
>
> =====================
> Check Out My Website: http://craneium.net
> Find me on LinkedIn: http://tinyurl.com/d6wlch
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Heroux, Michael A <maherou at sandia.gov
> >wrote:
>
> > I tend to use about 2x the number of cores on the system, assuming a
> > healthy amount of memory.
> >
> > Mike
> > ________________________________________
> > From: trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov [
> > trilinos-users-bounces at software.sandia.gov] on behalf of Dave Wade-Stein
> [
> > dws at txcorp.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:05 PM
> > To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> > Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> >
> > We routinely use -j 4 when building Trilinos 10.2.0 with no problems.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Matt G wrote:
> >
> > > I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> > different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to
> automate
> > the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the compilation. I
> > know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make (make -j) behave
> > unpredictably. Does anyone have some experiences trying this under the
> > cmake based 10 branch?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --Matthew Goodman
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Trilinos-Users mailing list
> > Trilinos-Users at software.sandia.gov
> > http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Trilinos-Users mailing list
> > Trilinos-Users at software.sandia.gov
> > http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://software.sandia.gov/pipermail/trilinos-users/attachments/20110606/ae0ed42d/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:05:37 -0400
> From: "Nuno Sucena Almeida" <slug at aeminium.org>
> Subject: Re: [Trilinos-Users] Question about Make -j
> To: trilinos-users at software.sandia.gov
> Message-ID: <4DED7961.1060307 at aeminium.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi,
> I've used make -jX with X=2..8 without a problem for trilinos 10. on
> 64bit systems, the only issue might be memory, after all you will be
> compiling C++ code, some of it with templates :)
> Nuno
>
> On 06/06/2011 07:45 PM, Matt G wrote:
> > I am going through a number of possible Trilinos configurations using
> > different blas/lapack/mpi to probe performance. Ideally I want to
> > automate the compilation and profiling, and the slowest part is the
> > compilation. I know Trilinos 9 has some issues that made parallel make
> > (make -j) behave unpredictably. Does anyone have
> > some experiences trying this under the cmake based 10 branch?
>
> --
> http://aeminium.org/slug/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trilinos-Users mailing list
> Trilinos-Users at software.sandia.gov
> http://software.sandia.gov/mailman/listinfo/trilinos-users
>
>
> End of Trilinos-Users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 2
> *********************************************
>
--
Ajay Rawat
Kalpakkam, IGCAR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Save Himalayas....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://software.sandia.gov/pipermail/trilinos-users/attachments/20110608/603acc4f/attachment.html
More information about the Trilinos-Users
mailing list